How One Taxation Problem Almost Cost Me My Spot as a Topnotcher

Board exam prep isn’t just about hard work—it’s about focus. Here’s how one late-night taxation problem led me into overthinking, shiny distractions, and almost cost me my spot as topnotcher. Learn the lesson every real estate examinee should know.

When you sit for a Real Estate Licensure Exam, whether as a Broker or an Appraiser, you know the subjects you’ll face: law, taxation, appraisal, ethics, and economics. But you will never know how many questions will appear in each subject or how difficult they will be. It’s a lottery of sorts. That unpredictability pushes many of us into the trap of overthinking, anticipating every possible scenario even when it’s unlikely.

And in my case, overthinking almost dragged me down—even though I made it to topnotcher.

The Night a Taxation Problem Wouldn't Let Me Sleep

One night after reviewing taxation—memorizing tax rates before and after TRAIN and CREATE Law—I called it a day. Or at least, I thought I did.

But if you’ve ever been in deep review mode, you’ll know this: 3 AM thoughts have a way of turning into imagined board exam questions. Out of nowhere, I found myself stuck on a bizarre scenario that from a comedy skit:

Shrek 3AM Thoughts
If Auntie Ansis Sy told you to stay away from her son, but paid ₱10,000,000.00 to do so, what taxes apply?
Auntie (Ansis Sy)

From there, the rabbit hole deepened:

  • Is it subject to donor’s tax, since money was given without equivalent value?
  • Or income tax, since technically I benefited from the “transaction”?
  • Could it trigger VAT?
  • If it was a bank transfer, would AMLA flag it?
  • If it was cash, could this count as money laundering?
  • Am I even required to issue a sales invoice or official receipt under the latest BIR rules?

I went in circles, replaying possibilities.

The Trap of Side Quests

The next morning, I wasn’t refreshed. I was drained. Even though I had every right to do so, I didn’t ask the review center for clarification, because by then I had already built a reputation as "that guy" who always asked difficult questions. Instead, I wrestled with it on my own—only to realize later that all that effort was poured into something that wouldn’t even show up on the exam.

Here’s the truth: that kind of “preparation” feels like diligence, but it’s really a distraction. It’s a side quest.

Yes, the taxation scenario was intellectually interesting. But obsessing over it didn’t bring me closer to the real goal—mastering the fundamentals, managing my time, and passing the board with confidence.

Overthinking often disguises itself as hard work, but in reality, it’s like chasing shiny objects. They look valuable, but in the bigger mission, they slow you down. Shiny objects are attractive, brain-tickling items that don't necessarily push you closer to your goal—a distraction.

And when you're preparing for something as high-stakes as a licensure exam, shiny objects cost you time, energy, and focus.

Finally, The Answer (Because Closure Matters)

So what's the answer to Auntie and daughter-in-law's taxation problem?

If someone pays you to refrain from doing something—like staying away from her son—it’s not a donation. (Intent to liberality is one of the essential conditions for a valid donation.) It’s a form of income, because you’re receiving compensation in exchange for an act (or in this case, a non-act).

Tax implication: It falls under income tax, not donor’s tax. No VAT is involved since you’re not engaged in an ordinary course of business.

On invoices/receipts: Since you are not engaged in trade or the regular practice of business, you are not required to issue an invoice or official receipt for a one-off personal transaction like this. The BIR requires invoices and official receipts primarily from registered businesses or professionals (brokers and appraisers, for example) derived in the ordinary course of trade or practice. However, it is income and should be declared in your ITR.

On Money-Laundering: AMLA will come into play. A "covered transaction" for Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) purposes is a cash or equivalent monetary instrument transaction exceeding PHP 500,000 within one banking day. Furthermore, regardless of the amount, any transaction that has suspicious circumstances must also be reported to the AMLC.

The Bigger Lesson

The one problem taught me something bigger than taxation rules:

  • Overthinking feels productive, but it’s procrastination in disguise.
  • Shiny objects steal your time and energy from the main mission.
  • The board exam rewards clarity, not complexity.

So if you’re in review mode, don’t fall into the same trap. Focus on the essentials, and don’t let shiny objects drag you away from what truly matters.

And yes—don’t treat shiny objects as hidden treasure you found from someone else’s property and overthink more scenarios outside Article 438 of the Philippine Civil Code that won’t even appear in the exam.

Joro has always been a developer—first of himself, then of software, and now of real estate spaces where people can thrive. A Computer Science master’s graduate and Real Estate Board Topnotcher, he bridges data with human stories, turning properties into safe spaces. Once a faceless humor and travel blogger, he now builds not just code or communities, but futures. And when he’s not mapping property trends, he’s out catching Pokémon, proving that every journey—digital or real—is part of the adventure.

Explore More